Faith, a Symphony

Ask Me Anything   Obligatory about me page   

I'm just doing my own thing now, if that's okay?

I'm Jack, am 18, and this is a place for my head to relax... You will more than likely find generic geek culture, music related posts, and the workings of a mind that thinks much too much about the little things, and so winds itself up... so the occasional rant.

Most of all, this is a personal space, but also a place for me to finally let my head stop sometimes, so be prepared for rambles, but most of all gaming, geek culture and stockings.

Also, am getting back into song-writing, so if you have any ideas/chord progressions you think I should try, send them in.

Also I run cosmojarvis.tumblr.com, because that man is pure brilliance!

Ask box is always open if you wanna drop questions in =)

k-n3ko:

coresilence:

bythebeatofmyowndrum:

janedoodles:

arimaarie:

amazingdan-and-philisnotonfire:

whipmyfrobackandforth:

whereisbrentlmaojager:

trillcvmpo:

euryd1ce:

omg the first episode of fairly odd parents

omg

I reMEMBER

this is better than the whole series

“I’m sorry, the secret word was pie” OH MY GOD

Cosmos voice was hunky hahaha!

REMEMBER WHEN COSMO’S VOICE WASn”T ANNOYING

Remember when Vicky randomly pulled out a porn magazine. I didn’t…

oh…god…I never saw this episode before.

And yes I really liked Cosmo’s voice. <w>~

Hahahah, I remember this episode!

Hi, I’m Cosmo McClure, You may remember me from such wishes as “turn into a whale and eat Vicky” and “I’m sorry, the secret word was pie”!

(Source: kimsbaked, via annierall)

— 9 minutes ago with 38498 notes

What do actually do in Animal Crossing games, I’ve never really watched gameplay, and am curious?

— 2 hours ago with 2 notes
#animal crossing  #new leaf 

mandatoryupgrades:

New ship: puppetmoshpit x fucked up anonymous asks.

— 3 hours ago with 32 notes

cityoferudite:

Star Trek Into Darkness: John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch)

(via waitingonthehill)

— 3 hours ago with 12913 notes

drawmeasong:

HE WAS SO CUTE AND CHEERFUL

(Source: jacknicholson, via kylesprite)

— 3 hours ago with 67510 notes

jeffersonshatt:

can we talk about nbc hannibal’s tags for a secondimage

because i just

image

cannot

image

image

image

sassiest official blog of anything i have ever followed everyone go home

(via cryptaniac)

— 3 hours ago with 17345 notes
lizdexia:

Hey guys. So I want to talk to you about one of the greatest heroines ever written for young adult literature, and that is A Series of Unfortunate Events’ Violet Baudelaire.
In any discussion of women in YA lit, there are basically three names that come up: Bella Swan (generally derided as weak and useless), Hermione Granger (whom everyone agrees is THE BESTEST!!!!), and Katniss Everdeen (jury’s still out on that one, but the consensus as far as I’ve seen is that feminist bloggers and Twilight haters alike super love her). Violet rarely comes up, which I think is a shame, because I would argue that she’s perhaps better written than all three of those other young women.
Note that I’m not saying she’s a better woman. This isn’t one of those posts where someone tries to empirically prove that this character is TOTALLY BETTER than that character, because I find that sort of thing dull and counterproductive. I’m not trying to pit different ladies against each other, because I’m generally against that sort of thing (though I don’t think having a preference between two female characters or real-life women makes you sexist). This is more of an exploration on how young women are treated in books geared toward tweens, and how we could all perhaps take a lesson from Daniel Handler (a male writer, interestingly enough) in this arena.
The first thing that strikes me when analyzing ASOUE from a feminist perspective is that Violet is, of course, a skilled inventor, a field in which you don’t see many fictional women. A different writer might have stuck to more “traditional” gender roles and cast Violet as the bookish wordsmith and Klaus as the science-minded inventor, but wouldn’t that have been boring, really? The boy tinkers around in his laboratory and invents things that save the day, and his sister occasionally correctly defines a word. Boring. But what’s even more interesting to me is that Violet, despite having tremendous skill in a traditionally “non-feminine” area, is never presented as The Exceptional Woman, which is perhaps my least favorite trope in fiction, one that has ruined countless characters for me (Veronica Mars, Ginny Weasley, River Song). Rather, each of the kids in the book has one particular skill that saves everyone else’s asses at least once, and even among the girls, they’re evenly split between the “feminine” (Sunny the cook, Isadora the poet) and the “masculine” (Violet the inventor, Fiona the mycologist).
Furthermore, her looks are only commented on once or twice, and always by another character — never by herself or the narrator. This is significant. Young women in literature are almost always given a thorough physical description, whether it’s fawning or, more commonly, one of those “So-and-so was hardly beautiful — in fact, she was really rather plain, with boring brown eyes and long dark hair that fell into her face” deals that contemporary authors love. Even in Harry Potter and The Hunger Games, Katniss and Hermione’s appearances are mentioned quite a few times. But in ASOUE, none of the Baudelaire kids are really described in detail, aside from Klaus’s glasses (which are often a plot point) and Violet tying up her hair when she has to think. THIS IS HUGE. I don’t know if I’m making a mountain out of a molehill here, but honestly, it’s so refreshing to see a teenage girl character who isn’t defined in any way by her looks, whether beautiful or exceptionally “plain.” It simply doesn’t matter; she’s got 99 problems but a zit ain’t one. Similarly, while she and Klaus both get romantic subplots with tertiary characters, they never threaten to take over the actual plot. These kids are kind of busy trying to escape a crapton of people who want them dead, and there’s not a ton of time left over to moon over Quigley Quagmire (though I loved their little romance, don’t get me wrong!).
Furthermore, LET’S TALK ABOUT THE MORAL AMBIGUITY OF THIS CHARACTER. There are quite a few moments in the books wherein Violet and Klaus discuss whether or not their actions — causing lots of deaths, burning down the carnival and the Hotel Denouement, et cetera — mean that they’re just as bad as the people from whom they’re running. I mean, there have probably been lots of essays written about how smart these books are (come on, it’s essentially a kids’ book series about ethical relativism!) but honestly, how often in the lit world, kids’ or adults’, do you see teenage female characters struggling with these kinds of huge moral issues? Not particularly often, to my knowledge.
This obviously isn’t the most well-written little post and I’m probably going to revise it a bunch of times until it’s actually a smart piece of analysis and not just a FEELINGS GEYSER about a criminally underrated kids’ book series, but for now, I’m just going to post it and that’s that.
The end, but not really.

lizdexia:

Hey guys. So I want to talk to you about one of the greatest heroines ever written for young adult literature, and that is A Series of Unfortunate Events’ Violet Baudelaire.

In any discussion of women in YA lit, there are basically three names that come up: Bella Swan (generally derided as weak and useless), Hermione Granger (whom everyone agrees is THE BESTEST!!!!), and Katniss Everdeen (jury’s still out on that one, but the consensus as far as I’ve seen is that feminist bloggers and Twilight haters alike super love her). Violet rarely comes up, which I think is a shame, because I would argue that she’s perhaps better written than all three of those other young women.

Note that I’m not saying she’s a better woman. This isn’t one of those posts where someone tries to empirically prove that this character is TOTALLY BETTER than that character, because I find that sort of thing dull and counterproductive. I’m not trying to pit different ladies against each other, because I’m generally against that sort of thing (though I don’t think having a preference between two female characters or real-life women makes you sexist). This is more of an exploration on how young women are treated in books geared toward tweens, and how we could all perhaps take a lesson from Daniel Handler (a male writer, interestingly enough) in this arena.

The first thing that strikes me when analyzing ASOUE from a feminist perspective is that Violet is, of course, a skilled inventor, a field in which you don’t see many fictional women. A different writer might have stuck to more “traditional” gender roles and cast Violet as the bookish wordsmith and Klaus as the science-minded inventor, but wouldn’t that have been boring, really? The boy tinkers around in his laboratory and invents things that save the day, and his sister occasionally correctly defines a word. Boring. But what’s even more interesting to me is that Violet, despite having tremendous skill in a traditionally “non-feminine” area, is never presented as The Exceptional Woman, which is perhaps my least favorite trope in fiction, one that has ruined countless characters for me (Veronica Mars, Ginny Weasley, River Song). Rather, each of the kids in the book has one particular skill that saves everyone else’s asses at least once, and even among the girls, they’re evenly split between the “feminine” (Sunny the cook, Isadora the poet) and the “masculine” (Violet the inventor, Fiona the mycologist).

Furthermore, her looks are only commented on once or twice, and always by another character — never by herself or the narrator. This is significant. Young women in literature are almost always given a thorough physical description, whether it’s fawning or, more commonly, one of those “So-and-so was hardly beautiful — in fact, she was really rather plain, with boring brown eyes and long dark hair that fell into her face” deals that contemporary authors love. Even in Harry Potter and The Hunger Games, Katniss and Hermione’s appearances are mentioned quite a few times. But in ASOUE, none of the Baudelaire kids are really described in detail, aside from Klaus’s glasses (which are often a plot point) and Violet tying up her hair when she has to think. THIS IS HUGE. I don’t know if I’m making a mountain out of a molehill here, but honestly, it’s so refreshing to see a teenage girl character who isn’t defined in any way by her looks, whether beautiful or exceptionally “plain.” It simply doesn’t matter; she’s got 99 problems but a zit ain’t one. Similarly, while she and Klaus both get romantic subplots with tertiary characters, they never threaten to take over the actual plot. These kids are kind of busy trying to escape a crapton of people who want them dead, and there’s not a ton of time left over to moon over Quigley Quagmire (though I loved their little romance, don’t get me wrong!).

Furthermore, LET’S TALK ABOUT THE MORAL AMBIGUITY OF THIS CHARACTER. There are quite a few moments in the books wherein Violet and Klaus discuss whether or not their actions — causing lots of deaths, burning down the carnival and the Hotel Denouement, et cetera — mean that they’re just as bad as the people from whom they’re running. I mean, there have probably been lots of essays written about how smart these books are (come on, it’s essentially a kids’ book series about ethical relativism!) but honestly, how often in the lit world, kids’ or adults’, do you see teenage female characters struggling with these kinds of huge moral issues? Not particularly often, to my knowledge.

This obviously isn’t the most well-written little post and I’m probably going to revise it a bunch of times until it’s actually a smart piece of analysis and not just a FEELINGS GEYSER about a criminally underrated kids’ book series, but for now, I’m just going to post it and that’s that.

The end, but not really.

(via somethingtrivial)

— 3 hours ago with 11762 notes

becauseiliveinnarnia:

aurorinthetardis:

ehmanuelle:

gifs that don’t make sense are my favourite thing like

image

and

image

i just

image

image

let me just add some here…image

image

image

(Source: a-suspicious-looking-person, via krykky)

— 3 hours ago with 77574 notes
Anonymous asked: Yes, that made sense! You'll get there, it just might take a while is all. That is super cute! I'm not a massive fan of dogs (You totally shouldn't read that as 'I'm pretty scared of dogs' nope not at all), but yours sounds lovely. That's a looong time. Oh dear, the hurting thing doesn't sound too good :( Also, I don't think this'll fade from your life, because you're clearly adamant to remember it, and that should be enough. Ah. Life, eh? How's your day been?


Answer:

Yeah, just gotta wait and let myself move on slowly. Just that idleness I dislike :P

Fair enough, some people aren’t, tis fine. He’s quite a big dog, but he cannot hurt anyone. He loves playing with small dogs, but he gets really scared of hurting them, so they usually just run around him :)

It isn’t too good, but think can get through it. And I am adamant, I couldn’t forgive myself if I forgot how much she saved me, and how happy she’s made me. Life’s a tosser. Day’s been quiet, song-writing and not much else. Need good weather so can cycle really, yours?

— 4 hours ago

rebelfreakat221b:

andratien:

supernatural-addicted:

lapfulofmisha:

someblokecalledrichbrook:

so far Tumblr is obsessed with: 

  • A genocidal, time-travelling alien
  • A sociopathic detective 
  • An insane, mass-murdering god of mischief
  • A manipulative cannibal 
  • Two monster-hunting serial killers

welcome to tumblr  

Don’t forget the gay angel

This is so accurate I want to cry

don’t forget satan. we love us some satan.

Great, now we have to sacrifice some one to make it up to Satan.

(via amijusttumblinalone)

— 4 hours ago with 22463 notes
lordnbz:

NEW CHALLENGER MAAAAN

lordnbz:

NEW CHALLENGER MAAAAN

— 4 hours ago with 18 notes

death-limes:

vaspim2k13:

On Monday, during a parliamentary commission hearing to determine if he was a fit for the top court, he was asked whether the death penalty should be applied in cases of rape. His response?

“Consideration needs to be taken thoroughly for the imposition of death penalty for a rapist because in a rape case both the rapist and the victim enjoy it.”

I think I’m going to be sick

“NOPE” i scream from the top of Mt. Everest as i jump off and qwop into the fucking sun

(Source: vaspim, via the-incredible-loser)

— 6 hours ago with 48082 notes

ragenineteen:

I maked a cartoon with Superman in it! He’s a real asshole.

— 9 hours ago with 43 notes